Conclusive proofs – assessed by Sanjeev Sabhlok

Objections to the view re: beef eating in India

http://www.love4cow.com/cowandthevedas.htm

Harsh Vora's comment here: http://sabhlokcity.com/2010/11/clearing-the-mist-around-max-muller/comment-page-1/#comment-6687

Details:

This slanderous campaign has been unleashed by different vested interests to embarrass Hindus around the world citing specific references from the Vedas.

This also comes handy in convincing poor and illiterate Indians to give up their faith on the grounds that their fundamental holy books – the Vedas – contain all the inhuman elements like denigration of women, meat-eating, polygamy, casteism and above all – beef eating.
 
The Vedas are also accused of animal sacrifice in sacrificial ceremonies popularly known as the YAJNA. Interestingly a section of home-bred intellectuals claiming to have deep study of ancient India has also come up, who cite references from works of western indologists to prove such unholy content in the Vedas.
 
Saying that the Vedas permit beef-eating and cow-slaughter amounts to striking a lethal blow to a Hindu’s soul. Respect for cow forms a core tenet of Hinduism. Once you are able to convince him of flaws in the foundation of this core tenet and make him feel guilty, he becomes an easy prey for the predator faiths. There are millions of ill-informed Hindus who are not empowered to counter argue and hence quietly surrender.
 
The vested interests that malign the Vedas are not confined to foreign and home-bred indologists alone. A certain class among Hindus exploited the rest of the population including the socially and economically weaker sections by forcing them to believe and follow what they said in the name of Vedas or else face the wrath.
 
All the slanders heaped upon the Vedas can be attributed mainly to the interpretations of commentaries written by Mahidhar, Uvat and Saayan in the medieval times; and to what Vam-margis or the Tantra cult propagated in their books in the name of the Vedas.
 
In due course the falsehood spread far and wide and they became even more deep rooted when western scholars with their half baked knowledge of Sanskrit transliterated these interpretations of commentaries of Sayan and Mahidhar, in the name of translating the Vedas.
 
However, they lacked the pre-requisite understanding of Shiksha (Phonetics), Vyakarana (Grammar), Nirukta (Philology), Nighantu (Vocabulary), Chhanda (Prosody), Jyotish (Astronomy), Kalpa and so on that are critical for correct interpretation of the Vedas.
 
The purpose behind this series of videos is to objectively evaluate all such misconceptions about the Vedas – the foundation of human knowledge and establish their piety, sanctity, great ideals and philosophy that cater not only to Hindus but to every human being without bars, bias or discrimination of any kind.
 
Section 1: No  violence against animals
——————————————
Yasmintsarvaani bhutaanyaatmaivaabhuudvijaanatah
Tatra ko mohah kah shokah ekatvamanupasyatah
Yajurveda 40.7

 
“Those who see all beings as souls do not feel infatuation or anguish at their sight, for they experience oneness with them”.
 
How could people who believed in the doctrines of indestructibility, transmigration  dare to kill living animals in yajnas? They might be seeing the souls of their own near and dear ones of bygone days residing in those living beings.
———————————————
Anumantaa vishasitaa nihantaa krayavikrayee
Samskartaa chopahartaa cha khadakashcheti ghaatakaah
Manusmrithi 5.51

 
Those who permit slaying of animals; those who bring animals for slaughter; those who slaughter; those who sell meat; those who purchase meat; those who prepare dish out of it; those who serve that
meat and those who eat are all murderers.
———————————————
Breehimattam yavamattamatho maashamatho tilam
Esha vaam bhaago nihito ratnadheyaaya dantau maa hinsishtam pitaram maataram cha
Atharvaveda 6.140.2

 
O teeth! You eat rice, you eat barley, you gram and you eat sesame. These cereals are specifically meant for you. Do not kill those who are capable of being fathers and mothers.
——————————————–
Ya aamam maansamadanti paurusheyam cha ye kravih
Garbhaan khaadanti keshavaastaanito naashayaamasi
Atharvaveda 8.6.23

We ought to destroy those who eat cooked as well as uncooked meat, meat involving destruction of males and females, foetus and eggs.
——————————————-
Anago hatya vai bheema kritye
Maa no gaamashvam purusham vadheeh
Atharvaveda 10.1.29
 
It is definitely a great sin to kill innocents. Do not kill our cows, horses and people.
 
How could there be justification of cow and other animals being killed when killing is so clearly prohibited in the Vedas?
———————————————
Aghnyaa yajamaanasya pashoonpahi
Yajurveda 1.1

 
“O human! animals are Aghnya – not to be killed. Protect the animals”
———————————————
Pashunstraayethaam
Yajurveda 6.11 

 
Protect the animals.
———————————————
Dwipaadava Chatushpaatpaahi
Yajurveda 14.8

 
Protect the bipeds and quadrupeds!
———————————————-
Kravy da –kravya[ meat obtained from slaughter] + Ada [ the eater]—the meat eater.
 
Pisacha — pisita [meat] +asa [eater]—the meat eater.
 
Asutrpa — Asu [breath of life] + trpa [one who satisfies himself on]—one who takes others life for his meals.
 
Garba da and Anda da – the foetus and egg eaters.
 
Mans da – the meat eaters
 
Meat eaters have always been looked down in Vedic literature. They have been known as Rakshasas, Pisacha and so on….All these words are synonyms of demons or devils that have been out-cast from the civilized human society.
——————————————–

Urjam no dhehi dwipade chatushpade
Yajurveda 11.83

 
“May all bipeds and quadrupeds gain strength and nourishment”
 
This mantra is recited by Hindus before every meal. How could the same philosophy which prays for well-being of every soul in every moment of life, approve of killing animals?
———————————————–
 
Section 1: No  violence in Yajna
 
Yajna never meant animal sacrifice in the sense popularly understood. Yajna in the Vedas meant a noble deed or the highest purifying action.
 
—————————————–

Adhvara iti Yajnanaama – Dhvaratihimsaakarmaa tatpratishedhah
Nirukta 2.7

 
According to Yaaska Acharya, one of the synonyms of Yajna in Nirukta or the Vedic philology is Adhvara.
 
Dhvara means an act with himsa or violence. And therefore a-dhvara means an act involving no himsa or no violence. There are a large number of such usage of Adhvara in the Vedas.
———————————————
 
In the post-Mahabharata period, misinterpretation of the Vedas and interpolations in other scriptures took place at various points intime. Acharya Shankar reestablished the Vedic values to an extent.
 
In the more recent times, Swami Dayanand Saraswati – known as the grandfather of modern India – interpreted the Vedas as per thecorrect rules of the language and authentic evidences. His literature, which includes commentary on the Vedas, Satyarth Prakash loosely translated as Light of Truth, An Introduction to the Vedas and other texts led to widespread social reformation based on Vedic philosophy and dispelling of myths surrounding the Vedas.
 
Let us discover what the Vedas have to say on Yajna.
 
————————————–
 
Agne yam yagnamadhvaram vishwatah pari bhuurasi
Sa id deveshu gacchati
Rigveda 1.1.4

 
O lord of effulgence! The non-violent Yajna, you prescribe from all sides, is beneficial for all, touches divine proportions and is accepted by noble souls.
—————————————-
 
The Rigveda describes Yajna as Adhvara  or non violent throughout. Same is the case with all the other Vedas. How can it be then concluded that the Vedas permit violence or slaughter of animals?
 
The biggest accusation of cattle and cow slaughter comes in the context of the Yajnas that derived their names from different cattle like the Ashwamedh Yajna, the Gomedha Yajna and the Nar-medh Yajna. Even by the wildest stretch of the imagination the word Medha would not mean slaughter in this context.
 
It’s interesting to note what Yajurveda says about a horse
——————————————————–
 
Imam ma himsirekashafam pashum kanikradam vaajinam vaajineshu
Yajurveda 13.48

 
Do not slaughter this one hoofed animal that neighs and who goes with a speed faster than most of the animals.
———————————————————-
 
Aswamedha does not mean horse sacrifice at Yajna. Instead the Yajurveda clearly mentions that a horse ought not to be slaughtered.
 
In Shathapatha, Ashwa is a word for the nation or empire
 
The word medha does not mean slaughter. It denotes an act done in accordance to the intellect Alternatively it could mean consolidation, as evident from the root meaning of medha i.e. medhru san-ga-me
 
Raashtram vaa ashwamedhah
Annam hi gau
Agnirvaa ashwah
Aajyam medhah
(Shatpath 13.1.6.3)
 
Swami Dayananda Saraswati wrote in his Light of Truth:
 
A Yajna dedicated to the glory, wellbeing and prosperity of the Rashtra the nation or empire is known as the Ashwamedh yajna.
 
“To keep the food pure or to keep the senses under control, or to make the food pure or to make a good use of the rays of Sun or keep the earth free from impurities[clean] is called Gomedha Yajna”.
 
“The word Gau also means the Earth and the yajna dedicated to keep the Earth the environment clean is called Gomedha Yajna”
 
“The cremation of the body of a dead person in accordance with the principles laid down in the Vedas is called Naramedha Yajna”.
———————————————–
 
Section 3: No beef in Vedas
 
Not only the Vedas are against animal slaughter but also vehemently oppose and prohibit cow slaughter.Yajurveda forbids killing of cows, for they provide energizing food for human beings
———————————

Ghrtam duhaanaamaditim janaayaagne maa himsiheeh
Yajurveda 13.49

 
Do not kill cows and bulls who always deserve to be protected.
—————————————-

Aare gohaa nrhaa vadho vo astu
Rigveda 7.56.17

 
In Rigveda cow slaughter has been declared a heinous crime equivalent to human murder and it has been said that those who commits this crime should be punished.
—————————————–
 
Sooyavasaad bhagavatee hi bhooyaa atho vayam bhagvantah syaama
Addhi trnamaghnye vishwadaaneem piba shuddhamudakamaacharantee
Rigveda 1.164.40 or Atharv 7.73.11 or Atharv 9.10.20

 
The Aghnya cows – which are not to be killed under any circumstances– may keep themselves healthy by use of pure water and green grass, so that we may be endowed with virtues, knowledge and wealth.
—————————————

The Vedic Lexicon, Nighantu, gives amongst other synonyms of Gau[ or cow] the words Aghnya. Ahi, and Aditi. Yaska the commentator on Nighantu, defines these as-
Aghnya the one that ought not to be killed
Ahi the one that must not be slaughtered.
Aditi the one that ought not to be cut into pieces.

 
These three names of cow signify that the animal ought not to be put to tortures. These words appear frequently throughout the Vedas in context of the cow.
 
——————————————–
 
Aghnyeyam saa vardhataam mahate soubhagaaya
 
Rigveda 1.164.27
Cow – The aghnya – brings us health and prosperity
 
Suprapaanam Bhavatvaghnyaayaah
Rigveda 5.83.8
There should be excellent facility for pure water for Aghnya Cow
 
Yah paurusheyena kravishaa samankte yo ashwena pashunaa yaatudhaanah
 
Yo aghnyaayaa bharati ksheeramagne teshaam sheershaani harasaapi vrishcha
Rigveda 10.87.16

 
Those who feed on human, horse or animal flesh and those who destroy milk-giving Aghnya cows should be severely punished.
 
Vimucchyadhvamaghnyaa devayaanaa aganma
Yajurveda 12.73
The Aghnya cows and bulls bring you prosperity
 
Maa gaamanaagaamaditim vadhishta
Rigveda 8.101.15
Do not kill the cow. Cow is innocent and aditi – that ought not to be cut into pieces
 
Antakaaya goghaatam
Yajurveda 30.18

Destroy those who kill cows
 
Yadi no gaam hansi yadyashwam yadi poorusham
Tam tvaa seesena vidhyaamo yatha no so aveeraha
Atharvaveda 1.16.4

 
If someone destroys our cows, horses or people, kill him with a bullet of lead.
Vatsam jaatamivaaghnyaa
Atharvaveda 3.30.1

Love each other as the Aghnya – non-killable cow – loves its calf
 
Dhenu sadanam rayeenaam
Atharvaveda 11.1.34

Cow is fountainhead of all bounties
 
The entire 28th Sukta or Hymn of 6th Mandal of Rigveda sings the glory of cow.
Aa gaavo agnamannuta bhadramakrantseedantu
 
Bhooyobhooyo rayimidasya vardhayannabhinne
 
Na taa nashanti na dabhaati taskaro naasaamamitro vyathiraa dadharshati

 
Na taa arvaa renukakaato ashnute na samskritramupa yanti taa abhi

 
Gaavo bhago gaava indro me achhaan

 
Yooyam gaavo medayathaa

 
Maa vah stena eeshata maaghanshasah
 
1. Everyone should ensure that cows are free from miseries and kept healthy.
2. God blesses those who take care of cows.
3. Even the enemies should not use any weapon on cows
4. No one should slaughter the cow
5. Cow brings prosperity and strength
6. If cows keep healthy and happy, men and women shall also keep disease free and prosperous
7. May the cow eat green grass and pure water. May they not be killed and bring prosperity to us.
———————————————-
 
What more proofs does one need to understand the high esteem in whichnot only the cow but each living being is held in the Vedas.
 
The learned audience can decide for themselves from these evidences that the Vedas are completely against any inhuman practice… to top it all the Beef and Cow slaughter.
 
There is no Beef in Vedas.
——————————————
Bibliography:
1.    Rigveda Bhashya – Commentary on Rigveda by Swami Dayanand Saraswati
 
2.    Yajurveda Bhashya – Commentary on Yajurveda by Swami Dayanand Saraswati
 
3.    No Beef in Vedas by BD Ukhul
 
4.    Vedon ka Yatharth Swaroop (True nature of Vedas) by Pt Dharmadeva Vidyavachaspati
 
5.    All 4 Veda Samhita by Pt Damodar Satvalekar
 
6.    Pracheen Bharat me Gomamsa – Ek Sameeksha (Beef in Ancient India – an analysis) by Geeta Press, Gorakhpur
 
7.    The Myth of Holy Cow – by DN Jha
 
8.    Hymns of Atharvaveda – Griffith
 
9.    Scared Books of the east – Max Muller
 
10.    Rigveda translations by Williams/Jones
 
11.    Sanskrit English Dictionary – Monier Williams
 
12.    Commentary on Vedas by Dayanand Sansthan
 
13.    Western Indologists – a study of motives by Pt Bhagvadutt
 
14.     Satyarth Prakash by Swami Dayanand Saraswati
 
15.     Introduction to Vedas by Swami Dayanand Saraswati
 
16.     Cloud over understanding of Vedas by BD Ukhul
 
17.    Shathpath Brahman
 
18.     Nirukta – Yaska Acharya
 
19.     Dhatupath – Panini
————————————————————
 
Addendum on 14 April 2010:
 
After this article, there was severe reaction from various sources who cannot live with the fact that Vedas and ancient culture of our nation could have been more ideal than their current communistic ideals. I received several mails that tried to refute the articles by citing additional references that support beef-eating. These include 2 mantras from Rigveda, and some Shlokas from Manu Smriti and a few other texts. An example is the comment from Avtar Gill on this page itself. On these, I have to say the following:
 
a. The article has given evidence from Manu Smriti itself which states that even one who permits killing is a murderer. Thus all these additional shlokas are either from adulterated Manu Smriti or misinterpreted by twisting of words. I recommend them to read Manu Smriti by Dr Surendra Kumar which is available from http://vedicbooks.com
 
b. A typical example of foul play by those hell-bent on justifying their obsession with beef in ancient texts, is to translate Mansa as ‘meat’. In reality, ‘Mansa’ is a generic word used to denote pulp. Meat is called ‘Mansa’ because it is pulpy. So mere presence of ‘Mansa’ does not mean it refers to meat.
 
c. The other texts referred by them are among dubious ones not considered authoritative evidence. Their modus operandi is simple – state anything written in Sanskrit as Dharma and translate the way they want to prove whatever they want. This is how they have been fooling us all by filling our textbooks with all unverified demeaning claims.
 
d. With regards to Vedas, they could come up with two mantras that supposedly justify beef eating. Let us evaluate them:
 
Claim: Rigveda (10/85/13) declares, “On the occasion of a girl’s marriage oxen and cows are slaughtered.”
 
Fact: The mantra states that in winter, the rays of sun get weakened and then get strong again in spring. The word used for sun-rays in ‘Go’ which also means cow and hence the mantra can also be translated by making ‘cow’ and not ‘sun-rays’ as the subject. The word used for ‘weakened’ is ‘Hanyate’ which can also mean killing. But if that be so, why would the mantra go further and state in next line (which is deliberately not translated) that in spring, they start regaining their original form.
 
How can a cow killed in winter regain its health in spring? This amply proves how ignorant and biased communists malign Vedas.
 
Claim: Rigveda (6/17/1) states that “Indra used to eat the meat of cow, calf, horse and buffalo.”
 
Fact: The mantra states that brilliant scholars enlighten the world in the manner that wood enhances the fire of Yajna. I fail to understand from where did Avtar Gill and his friends discover Indra, cow, calf, horse and buffalo in this mantra!
 
In summary, I continue the challenge to everyone – cite one single mantra from Vedas that justify beef-eating and I shall be eager to embrace any faith that he or she may decide for me. If not, they should agree to revert back to the Vedas.

sabhlok

https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawlZg-wxlqY__0BKPVZdgahOSud3QRaPmk8

View more posts from this author
2 thoughts on “Objections to the view re: beef eating in India
  1. Sandeep Bhogaita

    No words can EVER express my thanks and sincere gratitude to you.
    Truth cannot be destroyed!

     
    Reply
  2. Saddha kumari

    How funny.  So in the one case you claim it is the animal in another the word cow means the "Suns rays".  How's this?  Gau in the Vedas means the sun's rays or light of knowledge and one should never kill the light of knowledge.  Which is why ancient Indians are beef.  That means it is you who do not understand the Vedas.

    Lord Buddha clearly stated that "Mansa" means lust.  Those who eat with lust, including plants, are killers and are like Asuras and demons.  Those who are free of lust are merely eating food which is why after the big lecture by Yagnavalkya on not eating "flesh" of cows, he says but "I eat it as long as it's tender"…  

    21. He (the Adhvaryu) then makes him enter the hall. Let him not eat   (the flesh) of either the cow or the ox; for the cow and the ox   doubtless support everything here on earth. The gods spake, 'Verily, the   cow and the ox support everything here: come, let us bestow on the cow   and the ox whatever vigour belongs to other species 1!'   Accordingly they bestowed on the cow and the ox whatever vigour   belonged to other species (of animals); and therefore the cow and the ox   eat most. Hence, were one to eat (the flesh) of an ox or a cow, there   would be, as it were, an eating of everything, or, as it were, a going   on to the end (or, to destruction). Such a one indeed would be likely  to  be born (again) as a strange being, (as one of whom there is) evil   report, such as 'he has expelled an embryo from a woman,' 'he has   committed a sin 2;' let him therefore not eat (the flesh) of the cow and the ox. Nevertheless Yâgñavalkya said, 'I, for one, eat it, provided that it is tender.'

    – Satapatha Brahmana 3:1:2:21

    So in the first instance he is talking about Gau as the Ray of knowledge, like the sun.  However, Yagnavalkya then says he eats it — meaning the actual animal.

    This is is why vegetarians should not interpret scripture.  Devdatta was a vegetarian.  

     
    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *